| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
This change is required to avoid warnings about invalid
size-cells defined in device-tree pinctrl nodes for Exynos.
Tested on:
- Odroid U3
- Odroid XU3
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
|
|
For some files I neglected to add a license. Rectify this:
arch/arm/dts/exynos4210-pinctrl-uboot.dtsi
arch/arm/dts/exynos4x12-pinctrl-uboot.dtsi
arch/arm/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl-uboot.dtsi
arch/arm/dts/exynos54xx-pinctrl-uboot.dtsi
arch/arm/dts/s5pc100-pinctrl.dtsi
arch/arm/dts/s5pc110-pinctrl.dtsi
This file came from Linux and has no license information there, so add a
comment to that effect:
arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h
This file also came from Linux - presumably someone from TI could add the
license:
include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/omap.h
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Ingrid Viitanen <ingrid.viitanen@nokia.com>
|
|
The pinctrl bindings used by Linux are an incomplete description of the
hardware. It is possible in most cases to determine the register address
of each, but not in all cases. By adding an additional property we can
fix this, and avoid adding a table to U-Boot for every single Exynos
SOC.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
