| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.
Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
The declarations should not be in common.h. Move them to the arch-specific
headers.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Fixup thinko defined(FSL_LSCH3) -> defined(CONFIG_FSL_LSCH3)]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
There are two LS series processors are built on ARMv8 Layersacpe
architecture currently, LS2085A and LS1043A. They are based on
ARMv8 core although use different chassis, so create fsl-layerscape
to refactor the common code for the LS series processors which also
paves the way for adding LS1043A platform.
Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu <Mingkai.Hu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <B48286@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu <Qianyu.Gong@freescale.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
