| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
There isn't a lot of benefit of have two separate files. With driver model
the code needs to be in the same driver, so it's better to have it in the
same file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
introduce BIT() definition, used in at91_udc gadget
driver.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
[remove all other occurrences of BIT(x) definition]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Acked-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
|
|
Add full link training as a fallback in case the fast link training
fails.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Allow this to be used by other Tegra SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
