| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
The bcm283x family of SoCs have a GPIO controller that also acts as
pinctrl controller.
This patch introduces a new pinctrl driver that can actually properly mux
devices into their device tree defined pin states and is now the primary
owner of the gpio device. The previous GPIO driver gets moved into a
subdevice of the pinctrl driver, bound to the same OF node.
That way whenever a device asks for pinctrl support, it gets it
automatically from the pinctrl driver and GPIO support is still available
in the normal command line phase.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
|
|
We can rely on the device tree to provide this information.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
So far we could only tell the gpio framework that a GPIO was mapped as input or
output, not as alternative function.
This patch adds support for determining whether a function is mapped as
alternative.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
|
|
Currently, CONFIG_BCM2835 is defined for all BCM283x builds and _BCM2836
is defined when building for that SoC. That means there isn't a single
define that means "exactly BCM2835". This will complicate future patches
where BCM2835-vs-anything-else needs to be determined simply.
Modify the code to define one or the other of CONFIG_BCM2835/BCM2836 so
future patches are simpler.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Move arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm283x/*
-> arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/include/mach/*
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
|
