| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Move this header out of the common header. Network support is used in
quite a few places but it still does not warrant blanket inclusion.
Note that this net.h header itself has quite a lot in it. It could be
split into the driver-mode support, functions, structures, checksumming,
etc.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
At present panic() is in the vsprintf.h header file. That does not seem
like an obvious choice for hang(), even though it relates to panic(). So
let's put hang() in its own header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Migrate a few more files]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hebb <tommyhebb@gmail.com>
|
|
Rockchip use 'arch-rockchip' instead of arch-$(SOC) as common
header file path, so that we can get the correct path directly.
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Rockchip bootrom will enter download mode if it returns from
spl/tpl with a non-zero value and couldn't find a valid image
in the backup partition.
This patch provide a method to instruct the system to back to
bootrom download mode by checking the BROM_DOWNLOAD_FLAG register.
As the bootrom download function relys on some modules such as
interrupts, so we need to back to bootrom as early as possbile
before the tpl/spl code override the interrupt configurations.
Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
|
|
The BROM supports forcing it to enter download-mode, if an appropriate
result/cmd-word is returned to it. There already is a series to
support this in review, so this prepares the (newly C-version) of the
back-to-bootrom code to accept a cmd to passed on to the BROM.
All the existing call-sites are adjusted to match the changed function
signature.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Tested-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
|
|
The back-to-bootrom implementation for Rockchip has always relied on
the stack-pointer being valid on entry, so there was little reason to
have this as an assembly implementation.
This provides a new C-only implementation of save_boot_params and
back_to_bootrom (relying on setjmp/longjmp) and removes the older
assembly-only implementation.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Tested-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
|
|
With the finer-grained control over LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT for TPL/SPL (i.e.
with the newly introduced distinction between TPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT and
SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT), we can simplify the #ifdef-check to simply use
CONFIG_IS_ENABELD.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
[fixed up to use 'puts' and LIBCOMMON:]
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
printf will increase the code size more than 1kb, but platform
like rk3036 has no enough space for it.
Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
|
|
At present if the return to bootrom fails (e.g. because you are not using
the Rockchip's bootrom's pointer table in MMC) then the board prints
SPL message and hangs. Print a message first if we can, to help in
understanding what happened when it hangs.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
|
