| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
As part of testing booting Linux kernels on Rockchip devices, it was
discovered by Ziyuan Xu and Sandy Patterson that we had multiple and for
some cases incomplete isb definitions. This was causing a failure to
boot of the Linux kernel.
In order to solve this problem as well as cover any corner cases that we
may also have had a number of changes are made in order to consolidate
things. First, <asm/barriers.h> now becomes the source of isb/dsb/dmb
definitions. This however introduces another complexity. Due to
needing to build SPL for 32bit tegra with -march=armv4 we need to borrow
the __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ logic from the Linux Kernel in a more complete
form. Move this from arch/arm/lib/Makefile to arch/arm/Makefile and add
a comment about it. Now that we can always know what the target CPU is
capable off we can get always do the correct thing for the barrier. The
final part of this is that need to be consistent everywhere and call
isb()/dsb()/dmb() and NOT call ISB/DSB/DMB in some cases and the
function names in others.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Sandy Patterson <apatterson@sightlogix.com>
Reported-by: Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com>
Reported-by: Sandy Patterson <apatterson@sightlogix.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Commit bfb33f0bc45b ("sunxi: mctl_mem_matches: Add missing memory
barrier") broke compilation for the Pine64, as dram_helper.c now
includes <asm/armv7.h>, which does not compile on arm64.
Fix this by moving all barrier instructions into a separate header
file, which can easily be shared between arm and arm64.
Also extend the inline assembly to take the "sy" argument, which is
optional for ARMv7, but mandatory for v8.
This fixes compilation for 64-bit sunxi boards (Pine64).
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
|
|
We are running with the caches disabled when mctl_mem_matches gets called,
but the cpu's write buffer is still there and can still get in the way,
add a memory barrier to fix this.
This avoids mctl_mem_matches always returning false in some cases, which
was resulting in:
U-Boot SPL 2015.07 (Apr 14 2016 - 18:47:26)
DRAM: 1024 MiB
U-Boot 2015.07 (Apr 14 2016 - 18:47:26 +0200) Allwinner Technology
CPU: Allwinner A23 (SUN8I)
DRAM: 512 MiB
Where 512 MiB is the right amount, but the DRAM controller would be
initialized for 1024 MiB.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
|
|
Some parts of the sunxi code cast explicitly between u32 values and pointers.
This is not a problem in practice, because all 64bit SoCs today only use the
lower 32 bits for their phyical address space. But we need to make sure that
the compiler is sure this is not an accident as well.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
|
|
Some of the code in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi is actually armv7 specific, while
most of it is just generic code that could as well be used on an AArch64 SoC.
Move all files that are not really tied to armv7 into a new mach-sunxi
directory.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
|
