| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Make clock_get_periph_rate() return the correct value for UART clocks.
This change needs to be applied before the patches that enable CONFIG_CLK
for Tegra SoCs before Tegra186, since enabling that option causes
ns16550_serial_ofdata_to_platdata() to rely on clk_get_rate() for UART
clocks, and clk_get_rate() eventually calls clock_get_periph_rate().
This change is a rather horrible hack, as explained in the comment added
to the clock driver. I've tried fixing this correctly for all clocks as
described in that comment, but there's too much fallout elsewhere. I
believe the clock driver has a number of bugs which all cancel each-other
out, and unravelling that chain is too complex at present. This change is
the smallest change that fixes clock_get_periph_rate() for UART clocks
while guaranteeing no change in behaviour for any other clock, which
avoids other regressions.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
A future patch will implement a clock uclass driver for Tegra. That driver
will call into Tegra's existing clock code to simplify the transition;
this avoids tieing the clock uclass patches into significant refactoring
of the existing custom clock API implementation.
Some of the Tegra clock APIs that manipulate peripheral clocks require
both the peripheral clock ID and parent clock ID to be passed in together.
However, the clock uclass API does not require any such "parent"
parameter, so the clock driver must determine this information itself.
This patch implements new Tegra- specific clock API
clock_get_periph_parent() for this purpose.
The new API is implemented in the core Tegra clock code rather than SoC-
specific clock code. The implementation uses various SoC-/clock-specific
data. That data is only available in SoC-specific clock code.
Consequently, two new internal APIs are added that enable the core clock
code to retrieve this information from the SoC-specific clock code. Due to
the structure of the Tegra clock code, this leads to some unfortunate code
duplication. However, this situation predates this patch.
Ideally, future work will de-duplicate the Tegra clock code, and migrate
it into drivers/clk/tegra. However, such refactoring is kept separate from
this series.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Currently, Tegra peripheral drivers control two aspects of their HW module
clock(s):
1) The clock enable/rate for the peripheral clock itself.
2) The system-level clock tree setup, i.e. the clock parent.
Aspect 1 is reasonable, but aspect 2 is a system-level decision, not
something that an individual peripheral driver should in general know
about or influence. Such system-level knowledge ties the driver to a
specific SoC implementation, even when they use generic APIs for clock
manipulation, since they must have SoC-specific knowledge such as parent
clock IDs. Limited exceptions exist, such as where peripheral HW is
expected to dynamically switch between clock sources at run-time, such
as CPU clock scaling or display clock conflict management in a multi-head
scenario.
This patch enhances the Tegra core code to perform system-level clock
tree setup, in a similar fashion to the Linux kernel Tegra clock driver.
This will allow future patches to simplify peripheral drivers by removing
the clock parent setup logic.
This change is required prior to converting peripheral drivers to use the
standard clock APIs, since:
1) The clock uclass doesn't currently support a set_parent() operation.
Adding one is possible, but not necessary at the moment.
2) The clock APIs retrieve all clock IDs from device tree, and the DT
bindings for almost all peripherals only includes information about the
relevant peripheral clocks, and not any potential parent clocks.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Fix a number of typos, including:
* "compatble" -> "compatible"
* "eanbeld" -> "enabled"
* "envrionment" -> "environment"
* "FTD" -> "FDT" (for "flattened device tree")
* "ommitted" -> "omitted"
* "overriden" -> "overridden"
* "partiton" -> "partition"
* "propogate" -> "propagate"
* "resourse" -> "resource"
* "rest in piece" -> "rest in peace"
* "suport" -> "support"
* "varible" -> "variable"
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
|
|
In a number of places we had wordings of the GPL (or LGPL in a few
cases) license text that were split in such a way that it wasn't caught
previously. Convert all of these to the correct SPDX-License-Identifier
tag.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
On currently supported SoCs, clk_m always runs at the same frequency as
the oscillator input. However newer SoC generations such as Tegra210 no
longer have that restriction. Prepare for that by separating clk_m from
the oscillator clock and allow SoC code to override the clk_m rate.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
AFAIK, for all PLLs on all Tegra SoCs, the primary PLL output frequency
is (input * m) / (n * p). However, PLLP's primary output (pllP_out0) on
T210 is the VCO output, and divp is not applied. pllP_out2 does have divp
applied. All other pllP_outN are divided down from pllP_out0. We only
support pllP_out0 in U-Boot at the time of writing.
Fix clock_get_rate() to handle this special case.
This corrects the returned rate for PLLP to be 408MHz rather than 204MHz.
In turn, this causes high enough dividers to be calculated for the various
peripheral clocks that feed off of PLLP. Without this, some peripherals
failed to operate correctly. For instance, one of my SD cards worked
perfectly but an older (presumably slower) card could not be read.
Note that prior to commit 722e000ccd72 "Tegra: PLL: use per-SoC pllinfo
table instead of PLL_DIVM/N/P, etc.", the calculated PLL frequency was
816MHz since the wrong values were being extracted from the PLLP divider
register. This caused overly large peripheral dividers to be calculated,
which while wrong, didn't cause any correctness issues; things simply ran
slower than they could.
Reported-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
We have flipped CONFIG_SPL_DISABLE_OF_CONTROL. We have cleansing
devices, $(SPL_) and CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(), so we are ready to clear
away the ugly logic in include/fdtdec.h:
#ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL
# if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && !defined(SPL_OF_CONTROL)
# define OF_CONTROL 0
# else
# define OF_CONTROL 1
# endif
#else
# define OF_CONTROL 0
#endif
Now CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_CONTROL) is the substitute. It refers to
CONFIG_OF_CONTROL for U-boot proper and CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL for
SPL.
Also, we no longer have to cancel CONFIG_OF_CONTROL in
include/config_uncmd_spl.h and scripts/Makefile.spl.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
The logic for simple PLLs on T124 was broken by this commit:
722e000c Tegra: PLL: use per-SoC pllinfo table instead of PLL_DIVM/N/P, etc.
Correct it by reading from the same pll_misc register that it writes to and
adding an entry for the DP PLL in the pllinfo table.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Added PLL variables (dividers mask/shift, lock enable/detect, etc.)
to new pllinfo struct for each Soc/PLL. PLLA/C/D/E/M/P/U/X.
Used pllinfo struct in all clock functions, validated on T210.
Should be equivalent to prior code on T124/114/30/20. Thanks
to Marcel Ziswiler for corrections to the T20/T30 values.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
Tested-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Added 38.4MHz/48MHz entries to pll_x_table for CPU PLL. Needs
to be measured - should be close to 700MHz (1.4G/2).
Note that some freqs aren't in the PLLU table in T210 TRM
(13, 26MHz), so I used the 12MHz table entry for them. They
shouldn't be selected since they're not viable T210 OSC freqs.
Since there are now 2 new OSC defines, all tables (pll_x_table,
PLLU) had to increase by two entries, but since 38.4/48MHz are
not viable osc freqs on T20/30/114, etc, they're just set to 0.
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Derived from Tegra124, modified as appropriate during T210
board bringup. Cleaned up debug statements to conserve
string space, too. This also adds misc 64-bit changes
from Thierry Reding/Stephen Warren.
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
A subsequent patch will enable the use of the architected timer on
ARMv8. Doing so implies that udelay() will be backed by this timer
implementation, and hence the architected timer must be ready when
udelay() is first called. The first time udelay() is used is while
resetting the debug UART, which happens very early. Make sure that
arch_timer_init() is called before that.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
A harmless but confusing warning is displayed when looking up the
DisplayPort PLL. Correct this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Add a simple function to enable external clocks.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Add functions to provide access to the display clocks on Tegra124 including
setting the clock rate for an EDP display.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Create a function which sets the source clock for a peripheral, given
the number of mux bits to adjust. This can then be used more generally.
For now, don't export it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
The get_pll() function can do the wrong thing if passed values that are
out of range. Add checks for this and add a function which can return
a 'simple' PLL. This can be defined by SoCs with their own clocks.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
When the CPU is in non-secure (NS) mode (when running U-Boot under a
secure monitor), certain actions cannot be taken, since they would need
to write to secure-only registers. One example is configuring the ARM
architectural timer's CNTFRQ register.
We could support this in one of two ways:
1) Compile twice, once for secure mode (in which case anything goes) and
once for non-secure mode (in which case certain actions are disabled).
This complicates things, since everyone needs to keep track of
different U-Boot binaries for different situations.
2) Detect NS mode at run-time, and optionally skip any impossible actions.
This has the advantage of a single U-Boot binary working in all cases.
(2) is not possible on ARM in general, since there's no architectural way
to detect secure-vs-non-secure. However, there is a Tegra-specific way to
detect this.
This patches uses that feature to detect secure vs. NS mode on Tegra, and
uses that to:
* Skip the ARM arch timer initialization.
* Set/clear an environment variable so that boot scripts can take
different action depending on which mode the CPU is in. This might be
something like:
if CPU is secure:
load secure monitor code into RAM.
boot secure monitor.
secure monitor will restart (a new copy of) U-Boot in NS mode.
else:
execute normal boot process
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
This commit moves files as follows:
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra20/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20/*
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra30/*
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra114/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra114/*
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra124* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/*
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra30/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra30/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra114/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra114/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra124/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/*
arch/arm/cpu/tegra20-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20/*
arch/arm/cpu/tegra30-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra30/*
arch/arm/cpu/tegra114-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra114/*
arch/arm/cpu/tegra124-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/*
arch/arm/cpu/tegra-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/*
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> [ on nyan-big ]
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
