| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
T210 support HSM and Schmitt options in the pinmux register (previous
chips placed these options in the drive group register). Update the
code to handle this.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Tegra210 moves some bits around in the pinmux registers. Update the code
to handle this.
This doesn't attempt to address the issues with the group-to-group varying
drive group register layout mentioned earlier. This patch handles the
SoC-to-SoC differences in the mux register layout.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
On some future SoCs, some per-drive-group features became per-pin
features. Move all type definitions early in the header so they can
be enabled irrespective of the setting of TEGRA_PMX_SOC_HAS_DRVGRPS.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
On some future SoCs, some of the per-drive-group features no longer
exist. Add some ifdefs to support this.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Future SoCs have a slightly different combination of pinmux options per
pin. This will be simpler to handle if we simply have one define per
option, rather than grouping various options together, in combinations
that don't align with future chips.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Tegra's drive group registers have a remarkably inconsistent layout. The
current U-Boot driver doesn't take this into account at all. Add a
comment to describe the issue, so at least anyone debugging the driver
will be aware of this. To solve this, we'd need to add a per-drive-group
data structure describing the layout for the individual register. Since
we don't set up too many drive groups in U-Boot at present, this
hopefully isn't causing too much practical issue. Still, we probably need
to fix this sometime.
Wth Tegra210, the register layout becomes almost entirely consistent, so
this problem partially solves itself over time.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
This is needed to correctly apply the new Jetson TK1 pinmux config.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
This commit moves files as follows:
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra20/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20/*
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra30/*
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra114/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra114/*
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra124* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/*
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra30/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra30/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra114/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra114/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra124/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/*
arch/arm/cpu/tegra20-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20/*
arch/arm/cpu/tegra30-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra30/*
arch/arm/cpu/tegra114-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra114/*
arch/arm/cpu/tegra124-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra124/*
arch/arm/cpu/tegra-common/* -> arch/arm/mach-tegra/*
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> [ on nyan-big ]
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
