| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This bit needs to be set for system suspend/resume to work. This setting
will be documented in an updated TRM at some time in the future.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Implement the procedure that the TRM mandates to initialize PLLREFE and
PLLE. This makes the PLL actually lock.
Note that this section of the TRM is being cleaned up to remove some
confusion. The set of register accesses in this patch should be final,
although the step numbers/descriptions might still change.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
While clk_m and the oscillator run at the same frequencies on Tegra114
and Tegra124, clk_m is the proper source for the architected timer. On
more recent Tegra generations, Tegra210 and later, both the oscillator
and clk_m can run at different frequencies. clk_m will be divided down
from the oscillator.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
On currently supported SoCs, clk_m always runs at the same frequency as
the oscillator input. However newer SoC generations such as Tegra210 no
longer have that restriction. Prepare for that by separating clk_m from
the oscillator clock and allow SoC code to override the clk_m rate.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
The logic for simple PLLs on T124 was broken by this commit:
722e000c Tegra: PLL: use per-SoC pllinfo table instead of PLL_DIVM/N/P, etc.
Correct it by reading from the same pll_misc register that it writes to and
adding an entry for the DP PLL in the pllinfo table.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Added PLL variables (dividers mask/shift, lock enable/detect, etc.)
to new pllinfo struct for each Soc/PLL. PLLA/C/D/E/M/P/U/X.
Used pllinfo struct in all clock functions, validated on T210.
Should be equivalent to prior code on T124/114/30/20. Thanks
to Marcel Ziswiler for corrections to the T20/T30 values.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
Tested-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
Added 38.4MHz/48MHz entries to pll_x_table for CPU PLL. Needs
to be measured - should be close to 700MHz (1.4G/2).
Note that some freqs aren't in the PLLU table in T210 TRM
(13, 26MHz), so I used the 12MHz table entry for them. They
shouldn't be selected since they're not viable T210 OSC freqs.
Since there are now 2 new OSC defines, all tables (pll_x_table,
PLLU) had to increase by two entries, but since 38.4/48MHz are
not viable osc freqs on T20/30/114, etc, they're just set to 0.
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
|
All based off of Tegra124. As a Tegra210 board is brought
up, these may change a bit to match the HW more closely,
but probably 90% of this is identical to T124.
Note that since T210 is a 64-bit build, it has no SPL
component, and hence no cpu.c for Tegra210.
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
|
