| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Fix the link error for the combination of
CONFIG_ARCH_UNIPHIER_LD11=n
CONFIG_ARCH_UNIPHIER_LD20=n
CONFIG_ARCH_UNIPHIER_PXS3=y
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
This SoC is too old. It is difficult to maintain any longer.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
It has been a while since ARM Trusted Firmware supported UniPhier SoC
family. U-Boot SPL was intended as a temporary loader that runs in
secure world. It is a maintenance headache to support two different
boot mechanisms. Secure firmware is realm of ARM Trusted Firmware
and now U-Boot only serves as a non-secure boot loader for UniPhier
ARMv8 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Add the boot device table and reset deassertion for eMMC.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
For LD11 and LD20 SoCs, the RST_n pin is asserted by default. If
the EXT_CSD[162], bit[1:0] (RST_n_ENABLE) is fused, the eMMC device
would stay in the reset state until its RST_n pin is deasserted by
software.
Currently, this is cared by an ad-hoc way because the eMMC hardware
reset provider is not supported in U-Boot for now. This code should
be re-written once the "mmc-pwrseq-emmc" binding is supported.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Initial support for PXs3 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Merge init-*.c into a single file using a table of callbacks because
the initialization flow is almost common among SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The code here is cluttered due to the switch statement. Introduce a
table of callbacks to clean up the initialization code across SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The clock enable bits for UMC are more SoC-specific than for
the other hardware blocks. Separate the UMC clocks and the other
clocks for better code reuse across SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
- Initialize PLLs (SPL initializes only DPLL to save the precious
SPL memory footprint)
- Adjust CPLL/MPLL to the final tape-out frequency
- Set the Cortex-A53 clock to the maximum frequency since it is
running at 500MHz (SPLL/4) on startup
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Initialize the DPLL (PLL for DRAM) in SPL, and others in U-Boot
proper. Split the common code into pll-base-ld20.c for easier
re-use.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Now PLLs for DRAM controller are initialized in SPL, and the others
in U-Boot proper. Setting up all of them in a single directory will
be helpful when we want to share code between SPL and U-Boot proper.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The PLL for the DRAM interface must be initialized in SPL, but the
others can be delayed until U-Boot proper. Move them from SPL to
U-Boot proper to save the precious SPL memory footprint.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
This is a low-cost ARMv8 SoC from Socionext Inc.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
This is the first ARMv8 SoC from Socionext Inc.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The current CONFIG names like "CONFIG_ARCH_UNIPHIER_PH1_PRO4" is too
long. It would not hurt to drop "PH1_" because "UNIPHIER_" already
well specifies the SoC family. Also, rename files for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
After consulting with some of the SPDX team, the conclusion is that
Makefiles are worth adding SPDX-License-Identifier tags too, and most of
ours have one. This adds tags to ones that lack them and converts a few
that had full (or in one case, very partial) license blobs into the
equivalent tag.
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
The DDR SDRAM initialization code has not been mainlined yet, but
U-Boot proper should work.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The DDR SDRAM initialization code has not been mainlined yet, but
U-Boot proper should work.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Before this commit, the Kconfig menu in mach-uniphier only allowed us
to choose one SoC to be compiled. Each SoC has its own defconfig file
for the build-test coverage. Consequently, some defconfig files are
duplicated with only the difference in CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE and
CONFIG_{SOC_NAME}=y.
Now, most of board-specific parameters have been moved to device trees,
so it makes sense to include init code of multiple SoCs into a single
image as long as the SoCs have similar architecture. In fact, some
SoCs of UniPhier family are very similar:
- PH1-LD4 and PH1-sLD8
- PH1-LD6b and ProXstream2 (will be added in the upcoming commit)
This commit will be helpful to merge some defconfig files for better
maintainability.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
