| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Replace printf() with pr_() to specify proper loglevel.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
It seems more readable to use arrays to get SoC specific parameters
instead of the crappy switch statement.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Currently, uniphier_get_soc_type() converts the SoC ID (this is
read from the revision register) to an enum symbol to use it for SoC
identification. Come to think of it, there is no need for the
conversion in the first place. Using the SoC ID from the register
as-is a straightforward way.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Add the LD11 SoC data and adjuts the printf() format because this is
a 64-bit SoC. Otherwise, 16-digits pointer addresses would break
the log format.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Do not hard-code the number of DX blocks because it is a different
value for LD11 SoC.
Move the macro NR_DATX8_PER_DDRPHY to ddrphy-training.c since it
is the last user.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The DDR PHY register view of LD11 is slightly different from that
of LD4/Pro4/sLD8, but it will be possible to share the register
macros (and I want to re-use as much code as possible). Change
the code in the more flexible form.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Most of them are my mistakes.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
This does not have much impact on behavior, but makes code look more
more like Linux. The use of devm_ioremap() often helps to delete
.remove callbacks entirely.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The ifdef conditionals in header files prevent us from multi-SoC
support in a single U-Boot image. Detect SoC specific parameters
run-time rather than define them statically with an ifdef in
ddrphy-regs.h.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
These headers are only included locally in arch/arm/mach-uniphier/.
There is no reason to export them by putting in the mach/ directory.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
This command shows the register dump of the DDR PHY, so it would be
more at home in the dram subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
