Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Eliminate the "ph1"_ prefixes from function names because "uniphier_"
describes the SoC familiy better.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The current CONFIG names like "CONFIG_ARCH_UNIPHIER_PH1_PRO4" is too
long. It would not hurt to drop "PH1_" because "UNIPHIER_" already
well specifies the SoC family. Also, rename files for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
These headers are only included locally in arch/arm/mach-uniphier/.
There is no reason to export them by putting in the mach/ directory.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
After consulting with some of the SPDX team, the conclusion is that
Makefiles are worth adding SPDX-License-Identifier tags too, and most of
ours have one. This adds tags to ones that lack them and converts a few
that had full (or in one case, very partial) license blobs into the
equivalent tag.
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Before this commit, the Kconfig menu in mach-uniphier only allowed us
to choose one SoC to be compiled. Each SoC has its own defconfig file
for the build-test coverage. Consequently, some defconfig files are
duplicated with only the difference in CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE and
CONFIG_{SOC_NAME}=y.
Now, most of board-specific parameters have been moved to device trees,
so it makes sense to include init code of multiple SoCs into a single
image as long as the SoCs have similar architecture. In fact, some
SoCs of UniPhier family are very similar:
- PH1-LD4 and PH1-sLD8
- PH1-LD6b and ProXstream2 (will be added in the upcoming commit)
This commit will be helpful to merge some defconfig files for better
maintainability.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|