| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
[trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Move this field into arch_global_data and tidy up.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Update CONFIG_RAMBOOT and CONFIG_NAND_SPL references to accept CONFIG_SPL
and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, respectively. CONFIG_NAND_SPL can be removed once
the last mpc85xx nand_spl target is gone.
CONFIG_RAMBOOT will need to remain for other use cases, but it doesn't
seem right to overload it for meaning SPL as well as nand_spl does. Even
if it's somewhat appropriate for the main u-boot, the SPL itself isn't
(necessarily) ramboot, and we don't have separate configs for SPL and
main u-boot. It was also inconsistent, as other platforms such as
mpc83xx didn't use CONFIG_RAMBOOT in this way.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
|
It's arch code and not a driver, so move it where it belongs. When it
originally went into drivers/misc there was no 8xxx CPU directory.
This will make new-SPL support a little easier since we can keep the CPU
stuff together and not need to pull stuff in from drivers/misc.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
