| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
The function 'spin_wheel' is declared as inline, but not static and thus
we see warnings that 'w' and 'p' are declared static in a non-static
inline function. Correct this by marking spin_wheel as static inline.
Cc: TsiChung Liew <Tsi-Chung.Liew@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
The latest GCC is so clever that it reports more warnings
than old ones did:
------------------------------>8------------------------------
board/freescale/m5253demo/flash.c: In function 'flash_get_offsets':
board/freescale/m5253demo/flash.c:65:23: warning: iteration 2047u
invokes undefined behavior [-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
info->start[k + 1] = info->start[k] + CONFIG_SYS_SST_SECTSZ;
^
board/freescale/m5253demo/flash.c:64:3: note: containing loop
for (k = 0, j = 0; j < CONFIG_SYS_SST_SECT; j++, k++) {
^
------------------------------8<------------------------------
The cause of the warning is like this:
The for statement iterates 2048 times in flash_get_offsets() func.
(Notice CONFIG_SYS_SST_SECT is defined as 2048)
The last iteration does
info->start[2048] = info->start[2047] + CONFIG_SYS_SST_SECTSZ;
causing an undefined behavior.
(Please note the array size of info->start is 2048.
CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_SECT is defined as 2048 for this board.)
This commit fixes that so as not to overrun the info->start array.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Jason Jin <Jason.jin@freescale.com>
|
|
Fix the following warning messages:
In function 'flash_erase': 180:21:
warning: variable 'last' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
In function 'write_buff': 322:10:
warning: variable 'port_width' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: TsiChung Liew <Tsi-Chung.Liew@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
[trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <Tsi-Chung.Liew@freescale.com>
|
