Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This function can fail if the device tree runs out of space. Rather than
silently booting with an incomplete device tree, allow the failure to be
detected.
Unfortunately this involves changing a lot of places in the code. I have
not changed behvaiour to return an error where one is not currently
returned, to avoid unexpected breakage.
Eventually it would be nice to allow boards to register functions to be
called to update the device tree. This would avoid all the many functions
to do this. However it's not clear yet if this should be done using driver
model or with a linker list. This work is left for later.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
|
|
Fix ccsr_ddr structure to avoid using typedef. Combine DDR2 and DDR3
structure for 83xx, 85xx and 86xx.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
|
Freescale DDR driver has been used for mpc83xx, mpc85xx, mpc86xx SoCs.
The similar DDR controllers will be used for ARM-based SoCs.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
|
85xx, 86xx PowerPC folders have code variables with CamelCase naming conventions.
because of this code checkpatch script generates "WARNING: Avoid CamelCase".
Convert variables name to normal naming convention and modify board, driver
files with updated the new structure.
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
Acked-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
[trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
There were a number of shared files that were using
CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_DDR_ADDR, or CONFIG_SYS_MPC86xx_DDR_ADDR, and
several variants (DDR2, DDR3). A recent patchset added
85xx-specific ones to code which was used by 86xx systems.
After reviewing places where these constants were used, and
noting that the type definitions of the pointers assigned to
point to those addresses were the same, the cleanest approach
to fixing this problem was to unify the namespace for the
85xx, 83xx, and 86xx DDR address definitions.
This patch does:
s/CONFIG_SYS_MPC8.xx_DDR/CONFIG_SYS_MPC8xxx_DDR/g
All 85xx, 86xx, and 83xx have been built with this change.
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Tested-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
|
|
Using the raw value of 0x80000000 directly in the code can
lead to "count the zeros" bugs like that fixed in commit
718e9d13b98 ("MPC85xxCDS: Fix missing LCRR_DBYP bits for
66-133MHz LBC")
Change all existing raw values to use the symbolic value of
LCRR_DBYP instead.
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
|
Add spaces to cause the informational prints to line up with
the ones from init_func_ram() in board.c. Output now looks like
this:
....
DRAM: Detected 4096 MB of memory
This U-Boot only supports < 4G of DDR
You could rebuild it with CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
DDR: 2 GiB (DDR2, 64-bit, CL=5, ECC off)
....
The prints from lbc_sdram_init() have also been modified to line
line up and changed to start with "LBC SDRAM" instead of the
confusing "SDRAM".
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <beckyb@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
sdram_init() is used to initialize sdram on the lbc. Rename it
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <beckyb@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Correct initdram to use phys_size_t to represent the size of
dram; instead of changing this all over the place, and correcting
all the other random errors I've noticed, create a
common initdram that is used by all non-corenet 85xx parts. Most
of the initdram() functions were identical, with 2 common differences:
1) DDR tlbs for the fixed_sdram case were set up in initdram() on
some boards, and were part of the tlb_table on others. I have
changed them all over to the initdram() method - we shouldn't
be accessing dram before this point so they don't need to be
done sooner, and this seems cleaner.
2) Parts that require the DDR11 erratum workaround had different
implementations - I have adopted the version from the Freescale
errata document. It also looks like some of the versions were
buggy, and, depending on timing, could have resulted in the
DDR controller being disabled. This seems bad.
The xpedite boards had a common/fsl_8xxx_ddr.c; with this
change only the 517 board uses this so I have moved the ddr code
into that board's directory in xpedite517x.c
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <beckyb@kernel.crashing.org>
Tested-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Previously boards used a variety of indentations, newline styles, and
colon styles for the PCI information that is printed on bootup. This
patch unifies the style to look like:
...
NAND: 1024 MiB
PCIE1: connected as Root Complex
Scanning PCI bus 01
04 01 8086 1010 0200 00
04 01 8086 1010 0200 00
03 00 10b5 8112 0604 00
02 01 10b5 8518 0604 00
02 02 10b5 8518 0604 00
08 00 1957 0040 0b20 00
07 00 10b5 8518 0604 00
09 00 10b5 8112 0604 00
07 01 10b5 8518 0604 00
07 02 10b5 8518 0604 00
06 00 10b5 8518 0604 00
02 03 10b5 8518 0604 00
01 00 10b5 8518 0604 00
PCIE1: Bus 00 - 0b
PCIE2: connected as Root Complex
Scanning PCI bus 0d
0d 00 1957 0040 0b20 00
PCIE2: Bus 0c - 0d
In: serial
...
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
CC: wd@denx.de
CC: sr@denx.de
CC: galak@kernel.crashing.org
|
|
Currently, 83xx, 86xx, and 85xx have a lot of duplicated code
dedicated to defining and manipulating the LBC registers. Merge
this into a single spot.
To do this, we have to decide on a common name for the data structure
that holds the lbc registers - it will now be known as fsl_lbc_t, and we
adopt a common name for the immap layouts that include the lbc - this was
previously known as either im_lbc or lbus; use the former.
In addition, create accessors for the BR/OR regs that use in/out_be32
and use those instead of the mismash of access methods currently in play.
I have done a successful ppc build all and tested a board or two from
each processor family.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <beckyb@kernel.crashing.org>
Acked-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
On newer CPUs, 8536, 8572, and 8610, the CLKDIV field of LCRR is five bits
instead of four.
In order to avoid an ifdef, LCRR_CLKDIV is set to 0x1f on all systems. It
should be safe as the fifth bit was defined as reserved and set to 0.
Code that was using a hard coded 0x0f is changed to use LCRR_CLKDIV.
Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Acked-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
This patch changes the return type of initdram() from long int to phys_size_t.
This is required for a couple of reasons: long int limits the amount of dram
to 2GB, and u-boot in general is moving over to phys_size_t to represent the
size of physical memory. phys_size_t is defined as an unsigned long on almost
all current platforms.
This patch *only* changes the return type of the initdram function (in
include/common.h, as well as in each board's implementation of initdram). It
does not actually modify the code inside the function on any of the platforms;
platforms which wish to support more than 2GB of DRAM will need to modify
their initdram() function code.
Build tested with MAKEALL for ppc, arm, mips, mips-el. Booted on powerpc
MPC8641HPCN.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <becky.bruce@freescale.com>
|
|
A number of board ports have empty version of board_early_init_f
for no reason since we control its via CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Remove unused and unconfigured DDR test code from FSL 85xx boards.
Besides, other common code exists.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Many of the spd.h #includers don't need it,
and wanted to have spd_sdram() declared instead.
Since they didn't get that, some also had open
coded extern declarations of it instead or as well.
Fix it all up by using spd_sdram.h where needed.
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
|
|
Minor path corrections needed to ensure buildability.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|