| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
[trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Previously, SPD configuration of RAM was non functional on
this board. Now that the root cause is known (an i2c address
conflict), there is a simple end-user workaround - remove the
old slower local bus 128MB module and then SPD detection on the
main DDR2 memory module works fine.
We make the enablement of the LBC SDRAM support conditional on
being not SPD enabled. We can revisit this dependency as the
hardware workaround becomes available.
Turning off LBC SDRAM support revealed a couple implict dependencies
in the tlb/law code that always expected an LBC SDRAM address.
This has been tested with the default 256MB module, a 512MB
a 1GB and a 2GB, of varying speeds, and the SPD autoconfiguration
worked fine in all cases.
The default configuration remains to go with the hard coded
DDR config, so the default build will continue to work on boards
where people don't bother to read the docs. But the advantage
of going to the SPD config is that even the small default module
gets configured for CL3 instead of CL4.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
This board has an 8MB soldered on flash, and a 64MB SODIMM
flash module. Normally the board boots from the 8MB flash,
but the hardware can be configured for booting from the 64MB
flash as well by swapping CS0 and CS6. This can be handy
for recovery purposes, or for supporting u-boot and VxBoot
at the same time.
To support this in u-boot, we need to have different BR0/OR0
and BR6/OR6 settings in place for when the board is configured
in this way, and a different TEXT_BASE needs to be used due
to the larger sector size of the 64MB flash module.
We introduce the suffix _8M and _64M for the BR0/BR6 and the
OR0/OR6 values so it is clear which is being used to map what
specific device.
The larger sector size (512k) of the alternate flash needs
a larger malloc pool, otherwise you'll get failures when
running saveenv, so bump it up accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
The current situation has the 64MB user flash at an awkward
alignment; shifted back from 0xfc00_0000 by 8M, to leave an 8MB hole
for the soldered on boot flash @ EOM. But to switch to optionally
supporting booting off the 64MB flash, the 64MB will then be mapped
at the sane address of 0xfc00_0000.
This leads to awkward things when programming the 64MB flash prior
to transitioning to it -- i.e. even though the chip spans from
0xfb80_0000 to 0xff7f_ffff, you would have to program a u-boot image
into the two sectors from 0xfbf0_0000 --> 0xfbff_ffff so that it was
in the right place when JP12/SW2.8 were switched to make the 64MB on
/CS0. (i.e. the chip is only looking at the bits in mask 0x3ff_ffff)
We also have to have three TLB entries responsible for dealing with
mapping the 64MB flash due to this 8MB of misalignment.
In the end, there is address space from 0xec00_0000 to 0xefff_ffff
where we can map it, and then the transition from booting from one
config to the other will be a simple 0xec --> 0xfc mapping. Plus we
can toss out a TLB entry.
Note that TLB0 is kept at 64MB and not shrunk down to the 8MB boot
flash; this means we won't have to change it when the alternate
config uses the full 64MB for booting, in TLB0.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Remove duplicated code in SBC8548 board and utilize the common
fsl_pcie_init_board(). We also now dynamically setup the LAWs for PCI
controllers based on which PCIe controllers are enabled.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Tested-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
|
|
The PCI/PCI-e support for the sbc8548 was based on an earlier
version of what the MPC8548CDS board was using, and in its
current state it won't even compile. This re-syncs it to match
the latest codebase and makes use of the new shared PCI functions
to reduce board duplication.
It borrows from the MPC8568MDS, in that it pulls the PCI-e I/O
back to 0xe280_0000 (where PCI2 would be on MPC8548CDS), and
similarly it coalesces the PCI and PCI-e mem into one single TLB.
Both PCI-x and PCI-e have been tested with intel e1000 cards
under linux (with an accompanying dts change in place)
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
|
With the new LAW interface (set_next_law) we can move to letting the
system allocate which LAWs are used for what purpose. This makes life
a bit easier going forward with the new DDR code.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Becky Bruce <becky.bruce@freescale.com>
|
|
This commit gets rid of a huge amount of silly white-space issues.
Especially, all sequences of SPACEs followed by TAB characters get
removed (unless they appear in print statements).
Also remove all embedded "vim:" and "vi:" statements which hide
indentation problems.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
|
We should be using the _MEM_PHYS for LAW and TLB setup and not _MEM_BASE.
While _MEM_BASE & _MEM_PHYS are normally the same, _MEM_BASE should only
be used for configuring the PCI ATMU.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
