| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
commit 18b06652cd "tools: include u-boot version of sha256.h"
unconditionally forced the sha256.h from u-boot to be used
for tools instead of the host version. This is fragile though
as it will also include the host version. Therefore move it
to include/u-boot to join u-boot/md5.h etc which were renamed
for the same reason.
cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jeroen@myspectrum.nl>
|
|
This type is more readily available on the host compiler, so use it instead.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
if algo->digest_size is zero nothing is set in the str_output
buffer. An attempt is made to zero end the buffer, but the
pointer to the buffer is set to zero instead. I am unaware if
it causes any actual problems, but solves the following warning:
common/hash.c:217:13: warning: expression which evaluates to zero treated as
a null pointer constant of type 'char *' [-Wnon-literal-null-conversion]
str_ptr = '\0';
^~~~
cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jeroen@myspectrum.nl>
|
|
This function is useful for displaying a hash value, so export it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add hash_init(), hash_update() and hash_finish() to the
hash_algo struct. Add hash_lookup_algo() to look up the
struct given an algorithm name.
Signed-off-by: Hung-ying Tyan <tyanh@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
In the case of not having CONFIG_CMD_HASH but having CONFIG_CMD_CRC32
enabled (and not CONFIG_CRC32_VERIFY), we end up in this part of the
code path on hash_command(). However, we will only have exactly 3 args
here, and 3 > 3 is false, and we will not try and store the hash at the
address given as arg #3. The next problem however is that we've been
moving argv around so the third value is now in argv[0] not argv[3].
Confirmed on AM335x Beaglebone White.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
[trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
Rather than needing to call one of many hashing algorithms in U-Boot,
provide a function hash_block() which handles this, and can support all
available hash algorithms.
Once we have md5 supported within hashing, we can use this function in
the FIT image code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Adding H/W acceleration support to hash which can be used
to test SHA 256 hash algorithm.
Signed-off-by: ARUN MANKUZHI <arun.m@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Rather than use strcasecmp() in the hash algorithm search, require the
caller to do this first. Most of U-Boot can use lower case anyway, and
the hash command can convert to lower case before calling hash_command().
This saves needing strcasecmp() for boards that use hashing but not
the hash command.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Use map_sysmem() so that hashing is possible on sandbox.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add the CRC32 algorithm to the list of available hashes, and make
the crc32 command use hash_command(). Add a new crc32_wd_buf() to
make this possible, which puts its result in a buffer rather than
returning it as a 32-bit value.
Note: For some boards the hash command is not enabled, neither
are sha1, sha256 or the verify option. In this case the full
hash implementation adds about 500 bytes of overhead. So as a
special case, we use #ifdef to select very simple bahaviour in
that case. The justification for this is that it is currently
a very common case (virtually all boards enable crc32 but only
some enable more advanced features).
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Some hashing commands permit saving the hash in an environment variable,
and verifying a hash from there. But the crc32 command does not support
this. In order to permit crc32 to use the generic hashing infrastructure,
add a flag to select which behaviour to use.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
We have a SHA1 command and want to add a SHA256 command also. Instead of
duplicating the code, create a generic hash API which can process
commands for different algorithms.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
