| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
For some reason the AT91rm9200 lowlevel init writes to a bunch of
reserved or read-only addresses. All the boards seem to define the
value-to-be-written values as zero ... but they shouldn't actually
be writing *anything* there.
No documented erratum justifies these accesses. It looks like maybe
some pre-release BDI-2000 setup code has been carried along by cargo
cult programming since at least late 2004 (per GIT history).
Here's a patch disabling what seems to be bogosity. Tested on a
csb337; there were no behavioral changes.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
on RM9200ek
Tested-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
|
This fixes a naming bug for at91rm9200 lowlevel init code:
NOR boot flash is on chipselect 0, not chipselect 2. This
makes code use the register name from chip datasheets.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Patch by Anders Larsen, 03 May 2005
|
|
Patch by Anders Larsen, 29 Apr 2005
|
|
- creating SoC subdir for Atmel AT91RM9200 cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200
- moving code out of cpu/at91rm9200 into cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200
|
