| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The DT spec demands a unit-address in a node name to match the "reg"
property in that node. Newer dtc versions will throw warnings if this is
not the case.
Fix all occurences in the FIT image documentation files where this was not
observed, to not give bad examples to the reader.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
|
|
As you see in crypto_algos in common/image-sig.c, the algorithm
should be either "rsa2048" or "rsa4096". "rs2048" is a typo.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Add support for signing with the pkcs11 engine. This allows FIT images
to be signed with keys securely stored on a smartcard, hardware security
module, etc without exposing the keys.
Support for other engines can be added in the future by modifying
rsa_engine_get_pub_key() and rsa_engine_get_priv_key() to construct
correct key_id strings.
Signed-off-by: George McCollister <george.mccollister@gmail.com>
|
|
Add some basic clarification that the dev.key file generated by OpenSSL
contains both the public and private key, and further highlight that
the certificate generated here contains the public key only.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>
|
|
Remove the verified boot limitation that only allows a single
RSA public exponent of 65537 (F4). This change allows use with
existing PKI infrastructure and has been tested with HSM-based
PKI.
Change the configuration OF tree format to store the RSA public
exponent as a 64 bit integer and implement backward compatibility
for verified boot configuration trees without this extra field.
Parameterise vboot_test.sh to test different public exponents.
Mathematics and other hard work by Andrew Bott.
Tested with the following public exponents: 3, 5, 17, 257, 39981,
50457, 65537 and 4294967297.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bott <Andrew.Bott@ipaccess.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Wishart <Andrew.Wishart@ipaccess.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Piercy <Neil.Piercy@ipaccess.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael van der Westhuizen <michael@smart-africa.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
At present this tool only checks the configuration signing. Have it also
look at each of the images in the configuration and confirm that they
verify.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> (v1)
|
|
make the use of legacy image format configurable through
the config define CONFIG_IMAGE_FORMAT_LEGACY.
When relying on signed FIT images with required signature check
the legacy image format should be disabled. Therefore introduce
this new define and enable legacy image format if CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE
is not set. If CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE is set disable per default
the legacy image format.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Lars Steubesand <lars.steubesand@philips.com>
Cc: Mike Pearce <mike@kaew.be>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
add host tool "fit_check_sign" which verifies, if a fit image is
signed correct.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
based on patch from andreas@oetken.name:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/294318/
commit message:
I currently need support for rsa-sha256 signatures in u-boot and found out that
the code for signatures is not very generic. Thus adding of different
hash-algorithms for rsa-signatures is not easy to do without copy-pasting the
rsa-code. I attached a patch for how I think it could be better and included
support for rsa-sha256. This is a fast first shot.
aditionally work:
- removed checkpatch warnings
- removed compiler warnings
- rebased against current head
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Cc: andreas@oetken.name
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
While signing images is useful, it does not provide complete protection
against several types of attack. For example, it it possible to create a
FIT with the same signed images, but with the configuration changed such
that a different one is selected (mix and match attack). It is also possible
to substitute a signed image from an older FIT version into a newer FIT
(roll-back attack).
Add support for signing of FIT configurations using the libfdt's region
support.
Please see doc/uImage.FIT/signature.txt for more information.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add a structure to describe an algorithm which can sign and (later) verify
images.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
