| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add ahci compatible support for ls2080a soc.
Signed-off-by: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
[YS: add fallthrough comment]
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
Add ahci compatible support for ls1088a soc.
Signed-off-by: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
Add ahci compatible support for ls1046a soc.
Signed-off-by: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
Add ahci compatible support for ls1021a soc.
Signed-off-by: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
Add ahci compatible support for ls1043a soc.
Signed-off-by: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
Make the code structure more general so that more socs can be
added easily and also remove speed limitation restriction.
Add the ls1012a sata support as well.
Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <andy.tang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
(with and without CONFIG_OF_LIVE on zynqmp zcu102)
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
In v2018 the patch
"dm: ahci: Correct uclass private data"
(sha1: bfc1c6b4838501d10aa48c0e92eaf70976f4b2dd)
was causing an issue for ceva_sata.
But this issue is not in v2018.05-rc1 but still converting to
UCLASS_AHCI would make more sense.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
s/achi_/ahci_/g
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The patch:
"dm: ahci: Unwind the confusing init code"
(sha1: 7cf1afce7fa3fe64189020fe14b93f7326dd0758)
introduce bug for ceva sata because port didn't start.
On the other hand the dwc_ahci.c was fixed correctly.
Do the same change for ceva too.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@suse.com>
|
|
The SCSI uclass currently has no operations. It just uses the global SCSI
functions. Fix this by adding operations to the only two drivers that use
the uclass, and replacing the global functions with those defined locally
in the SCSI code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
Two AHCI drivers use SCSI with CONFIG_DM_SCSI. The SCSI uclass calls
scsi_low_level_init() which is implemented by ahci.c. If
CONFIG_SCSI_AHCI_PLAT is defined it does one thing and if it is not
it does something else.
We don't need to call through scsi_low_level_init() to get the init
completed. Instead, adjust the two drivers to call into AHCI directly.
Drop the post-probe init in the SCSI uclass. This means that driver model
doesn't need to use scsi_low_level_init(). It is a legacy function and
driver model should use a driver's probe() method instead.
While we are here, add a comment to the top of the file explaining what
ahci.c does.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
At present the two driver-model SCSI drivers use device platform data to
store information that relates to the uclass. It is better to use uclass
platform data in this situation. Update the code to do this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
At present we have the SATA and PATA drivers mixed up in the drivers/block
directory. It is better to split them out into their own place. Use
drivers/ata which is what Linux does.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
