| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Move this header out of the common header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
At present devices use a simple integer offset to record the device tree
node associated with the device. In preparation for supporting a live
device tree, which uses a node pointer instead, refactor existing code to
access this field through an inline function.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This makes the assumption that setting up pinctrl in cpu_init_r() is safe.
On samus we need GPIOs before relocation in order to support power control.
This commit fixes the following message on boot:
initcall sequence ffe5c6f4 failed at call ffe01d3d (err=-1)
### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###
In any case it seems better to leave init to driver model, so that it can
pick up the GPIO driver when it needs it. Since pinctrl is a dependency of
the GPIO driver, we may as well put the dependency there and avoid these
problems.
This reverts commit 9769e05bcf79939bad23a719982dd1f85a110f3c.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
Now that we have set up pin control in cpu_init_r(), remove the
duplicated codes in the broadwell gpio driver.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass,
the intel_broadwell driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine.
Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <eric@nelint.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add a GPIO driver for the GPIO peripheral found on broadwell devices.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
