Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
When MMC_TINY is enabled, support for only one MMC device
is provided. Boards that register more than one device,
will just write over mmc_static keeping only the last one
registered.
This commit prevents this, keeping only the first MMC
device created. A debug warning message is added, if nothing
else, as a hint/documentation for developers.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
|
|
Drop all the extra content from the MMC core, so that tiny MMC support
is really tiny, no fancy anything. That means the tiny MMC support does
only 1-bit transfers at default speed settings. Moreover, this patch
drops duplicate instance of struct mmc mmc_static, which wasted about
360 bytes. Furthermore, since MMC tiny supports only one controller
at all times, get rid of mallocating the ext csd backup and replace
it with static array. All in all, this patch saves ~4 kiB of bloat
from the MMC core, which on platforms with severe limitations can be
beneficial.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
[trini: Fixup checkpatch.pl style warnings]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
All boards which use DM_MMC have now been converted to use DM_MMC_OPS.
Drop the option and good riddance.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
At present if U-Boot proper uses driver model for MMC, then SPL has to
also. While this is desirable, it places a significant barrier to moving
to driver model in some cases. For example, with a space-constrained SPL
it may be necessary to enable CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA which involves
adjusting some drivers.
Add new SPL versions of the options for DM_MMC, DM_MMC_OPS and BLK. By
default these follow their non-SPL versions, but this can be changed by
boards which need it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Add new configuration option CONFIG_MMC_TINY which strips away all
memory allocation within the MMC code and code for handling multiple
cards. This allows extremely space-constrained SPL code use the MMC
framework.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
|
|
To prevent the compiler error, split the checking condition whether
cfg->ops is NULL or not.
It's more clearly, because it's not included in mmc_config structure
when CONFIG_DM_MMC_OPS is disabled.
drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c: In function ‘mmc_create’:
drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c:118:31: error: ‘const struct mmc_config’ has no member named ‘ops’
drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c:118:58: error: ‘const struct mmc_config’ has no member named ‘ops’
make[1]: *** [drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Rather than having #ifdef in mmc.c, move this code into the legacy file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
At present the MMC subsystem maintains its own list of MMC devices. This
cannot work with driver model, which needs to maintain this itself. Move the
list code into a separate 'legacy' file. The core MMC code remains, and will
be shared with the driver-model implementation.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|