| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
This field is no longer used since the DM conversion. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas.tynkkynen@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
|
Update SVR as per the SOC document.
-LS2081A: 0x870919 -> 0x870918
-LS2041A: 0x870915 -> 0x870914
Signed-off-by: Santan Kumar <santan.kumar@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
The QorIQ LS2081A SoC has eight 64-bit ARM v8 Cortex A72 cores and
is built on layerscape architecture. It is 40-pin derivative of
LS2084A (non-AIOP personality of LS2088A). So feature-wise it is
same as LS2084A. LS2041A is a 4-core personality of LS2081A.
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Santan Kumar <santan.kumar@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
The LS2088A series SoCs has different physical memory map address and
CCSR registers address against LS2080A series SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
In EP mode, to enable accesses from the Root Complex, the
CONFIG_READY bit must be set, otherwise any config attempts
from the Root Complex will be returned with config retry
status (CRS).
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
All Layerscape SoCs have supported new PCIe driver based on DM.
The lagecy PCIe driver code is unused and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
There are more than five kinds of Layerscape SoCs. unfortunately,
PCIe controller of each SoC is a little bit different. In order
to avoid too many macro definitions, the patch addes a new
implementation of PCIe driver based on DM. PCIe dts node is
used to describe the difference.
Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
|
To make the layerscape pcie driver clear, move the kernel DT fixup
code from pcie_layerscape.c to pcie_layerscape_fixup.c.
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
|
