Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Currently, if usb is disabled the following error is produced:
CC drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.o
drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c: In function ‘usb_lowlevel_init’:
drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c:2057:35: error: ‘CONFIG_SYS_USB_OHCI_REGS_BASE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE’?
gohci.regs = (struct ohci_regs *)CONFIG_SYS_USB_OHCI_REGS_BASE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE
drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c:2057:35: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c:2061:20: error: ‘CONFIG_SYS_USB_OHCI_SLOT_NAME’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘CONFIG_SYS_USB_OHCI_MAX_ROOT_PORTS’?
gohci.slot_name = CONFIG_SYS_USB_OHCI_SLOT_NAME;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CONFIG_SYS_USB_OHCI_MAX_ROOT_PORTS
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
|
|
We have the following cases:
- CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS was defined, migrate normally
- CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS_MAX was defined and then used for
CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS after a check, just migrate it over now.
- CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS was very oddly defined on p2771-0000-* (to 1024 +
2), set this to 8.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ãlvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|