| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The rproc uclass driver can either be built with SPL_REMOTEPROC
or REMOTEPROC, but the function prototypes in remoteproc.h are
defined only when CONFIG_REMOTEPROC is defined. This can cause
build issues in SPL if CONFIG_REMOTEPROC is not selected.
Fix this by replacing the existing precompiler macro usage with
CONFIG_IS_ENABLED.
Fixes: ddf56bc7e3ef ("drivers: Introduce a simplified remoteproc framework")
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
|
|
The current implementation supports only binary file load.
Add helpers to support ELF32 format (sanity check, and load).
Note that since an ELF32 image is built for the remote processor, the
load function uses the device_to_virt ops to translate the addresses.
Implement a basic translation for sandbox_testproc.
Add related tests. Test result:
=> ut dm remoteproc_elf
Test: dm_test_remoteproc_elf: remoteproc.c
Test: dm_test_remoteproc_elf: remoteproc.c (flat tree)
Failures: 0
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
|
|
Introduce the device_to_virt function to allow translation between
device address (remote processor view) and virtual address (main
processor view).
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
|
|
Add full function comment headers.
Fix rproc_is_initialized() return value description.
Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
|
|
Existing rproc_init() api tries to initialize all available
remoteproc devices. This will fail when there is dependency
among available remoteprocs. So introduce a separate api
that allows to initialize remoteprocs individually based
on id.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Many System on Chip(SoC) solutions are complex with multiple processors
on the same die dedicated to either general purpose of specialized
functions. Many examples do exist in today's SoCs from various vendors.
Typical examples are micro controllers such as an ARM M3/M0 doing a
offload of specific function such as event integration or power
management or controlling camera etc.
Traditionally, the responsibility of loading up such a processor with a
firmware and communication has been with a High Level Operating
System(HLOS) such as Linux. However, there exists classes of products
where Linux would need to expect services from such a processor or the
delay of Linux and operating system being able to load up such a
firmware is unacceptable.
To address these needs, we need some minimal capability to load such a
system and ensure it is started prior to an Operating System(Linux or
any other) is started up.
NOTE: This is NOT meant to be a solve-all solution, instead, it tries to
address certain class of SoCs and products that need such a solution.
A very simple model is introduced here as part of the initial support
that supports microcontrollers with internal memory (no MMU, no
execution from external memory, or specific image format needs). This
basic framework can then (hopefully) be extensible to other complex SoC
processor support as need be.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
