| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
At present the map only shows the offset and size for each region. The
image position provides the actual position of each entry in the image,
regardless of the section hierarchy.
Add the image position to the map.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This adds support for a Chromium verified boot block, used to sign a
read-write section of the image.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
At present each entry has an offset within its parent section. This is
useful for figuring out how entries relate to one another. However it
is sometimes necessary to locate an entry within an image, regardless
of which sections it is nested inside.
Add a new 'image-pos' property to provide this information. Also add
some documentation for the -u option binman provides, which updates the
device tree with final entry information.
Since the image position is a better symbol to use for the position of
U-Boot as obtained by SPL, update the SPL symbols to use this instead of
offset, which might be incorrect if hierarchical sections are used.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
At present the .map file produced for each image does not include the
overall image size. This is useful information.
Update the code to generate it in the .map file as well as the updated
FDT. Also fix a few comments while we are here.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
After some thought, I believe there is an unfortunate naming flaw in
binman. Entries have a position and size, but now that we support
hierarchical sections it is unclear whether a position should be an
absolute position within the image, or a relative position within its
parent section.
At present 'position' actually means the relative position. This indicates
a need for an 'image position' for code that wants to find the location of
an entry without having to do calculations back through parents to
discover this image position.
A better name for the current 'position' or 'pos' is 'offset'. It is not
always an absolute position, but it is always an offset from its parent
offset.
It is unfortunate to rename this concept now, 18 months after binman was
introduced. However I believe it is the right thing to do. The impact is
mostly limited to binman itself and a few changes to in-tree users to
binman:
tegra
sunxi
x86
The change makes old binman definitions (e.g. downstream or out-of-tree)
incompatible if they use the 'pos = <...>' property. Later work will
adjust binman to generate an error when it is used.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Once binman has packed the image, the position and size of each entry is
known. It is then possible for binman to update the device tree with these
positions. Since placeholder values have been added, this does not affect
the size of the device tree and therefore the packing does not need to be
performed again.
Add a new SetCalculatedProperties method to handle this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Some entry types modify the device tree, e.g. to remove microcode or add a
property. So far this just modifies their local copy and does not affect
a 'shared' device tree.
Rather than doing this modification in the ObtainContents() method, and a
new ProcessFdt() method which is specifically designed to modify this
shared device tree.
Move the existing device-tree code over to use this method, reducing
ObtainContents() to the goal of just obtaining the contents without any
processing, even for device tree.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
This method is supposed to return the contents of an entry. However at
present there is no check that it actually does. Also some implementations
do not return 'True' to indicate success, as required.
Add a check for things working as expected, and correct the
implementations.
This requires some additional test cases to cover things which were missed
originally. Add these at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Sometimes we have several sections which repeat the same entries (e.g. for
a read-only and read-write version of the same section). It is useful to
be able to tell these entries apart by name.
Add a new 'name-prefix' property for sections, which causes all entries
within that section to have a given name prefix.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
It is useful to be able to see a list of regions in each image produced by
binman. Add a -m option to output this information in a '.map' file
alongside the image file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
It is useful to be able to split an image into multiple sections,
each with its own size and position, for cases where a flash device has
read-only and read-write portions.
Add support for this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
We want to support multiple sections within a single image. To do this,
move most of the Image class implementation into a new Section class. An
Image contains only a single Section, but at some point we will support
a new 'section' entry, thus allowing Sections within Sections.
Use the name 'bsection' for the module so we can use 'section' for the
etype module.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
