Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
At present 'buildman sandbox' will build all 5 boards for the sandbox
architecture rather than the single board 'sandbox'. The only current way
to exclude sandbox_spl, sandbox_noblk, etc. is to use -x which is a bit
clumbsy.
Add a --boards option to allow individual build targets to be specified.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
As well as showing the number of boards, allow showing the actual list of
boards that would be built, if -v is provided.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
The README for buildman says that we can use any field in boards.cfg to
decide what to build. However, we were not saving the options field
correctly.
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Some boards are known to be broken and it is convenient to be able to
exclude them from the build.
Add an --exclude option to specific boards to exclude. This uses the
same matching rules as the normal 'include' arguments, and is a comma-
separated list of regular expressions.
Suggested-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Currently buildman allows a list of boards to build to be specified on the
command line. The list can include specific board names, architecture, SOC
and so on.
At present the list of boards is dealt with in an 'OR' fashion, and there
is no way to specify something like 'arm & freescale', meaning boards with
ARM architecture but only those made by Freescale. This would exclude the
PowerPC boards made by Freescale.
Support an '&' operator on the command line to permit this. Ensure that
arguments can be specified in a single string to permit easy shell quoting.
Suggested-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
|
|
Use "make <board>_defconfig" instead of "make <board>_config".
Invoke tools/genboardscfg.py to generate boards.cfg when it is missing.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
A common use-case is to build all boards for a particular SoC. This can
be achieved by:
./tools/buildman/buildman -b mainline_dev tegra20
However, when the SoC is a member of a family of SoCs, and each SoC has
a different name, it would be even more useful to build all boards for
every SoC in that family. This currently isn't possible since buildman's
board selection command-line arguments are compared to board definitions
using pure string equality.
To enable this, compare using a regex match instead. This matches
MAKEALL's handling of command-line arguments. This enables:
(all Tegra)
./tools/buildman/buildman -b mainline_dev tegra
(all Tegra)
./tools/buildman/buildman -b mainline_dev '^tegra.*$'
(all Tegra20, Tegra30 boards, but not Tegra114)
./tools/buildman/buildman -b mainline_dev 'tegra[23]'
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
Commit 27af930e9a5c91365ca639ada580b338eabe4989 changed the boards.cfg format
but missed to change the parsing in buildman.
This patch changes c'tor of Board class to the new sequence, but omits
maintainer field.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
|
|
Put all informations about targets, including state (active or
orphan) and maintainers, in boards.cfg; remove MAINTAINERS;
adjust the build system accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
[trini: Fixup common/cmd_io.c]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
|
|
This tool handles building U-Boot to check that you have not broken it
with your patch series. It can build each individual commit and report
which boards fail on which commits, and which errors come up. It also
shows differences in image sizes due to particular commits.
Buildman aims to make full use of multi-processor machines.
Documentation and caveats are in tools/buildman/README.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|