From 4805a7af8ebd4c604e1e32355927ec5035685121 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Glass Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:55:55 -0600 Subject: dm: core: Correct the return value for uclass_find_first_device() This function returns -ENODEV when there is no device. This is inconsistent with other functions, such as uclass_find_next_device(), which returns 0. Update it and tidy up the incorrect '-1' values in the comments. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Bin Meng Tested-by: Bin Meng --- test/dm/core.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'test/dm/core.c') diff --git a/test/dm/core.c b/test/dm/core.c index edd55b05d6..f74c430843 100644 --- a/test/dm/core.c +++ b/test/dm/core.c @@ -749,8 +749,7 @@ static int dm_test_uclass_devices_find(struct unit_test_state *uts) ut_assert(dev); } - ret = uclass_find_first_device(UCLASS_TEST_DUMMY, &dev); - ut_assert(ret == -ENODEV); + ut_assertok(uclass_find_first_device(UCLASS_TEST_DUMMY, &dev)); ut_assert(!dev); return 0; -- cgit