diff options
author | Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> | 2019-08-27 11:54:31 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> | 2019-08-30 14:17:11 -0400 |
commit | 5e0404ff85fca50b5ac41bf08bbe46e6de4903e7 (patch) | |
tree | 56bf3cdacc2e294deef24b2ffca4e3a9c01c942b /arch/arm/mach-rockchip | |
parent | 877294b56a52f1cb60bbfa7e4722fcc33451f7b2 (diff) |
board_f: fix noncached reservation calculation
The current code in reserve_noncached() has two issues:
1) The first update of gd->start_addr_sp always rounds down to a section
start. However, the equivalent calculation in cache.c:noncached_init()
always first rounds up to a section start, then subtracts a section size.
These two calculations differ if the initial value is already rounded to
section alignment.
2) The second update of gd->start_addr_sp subtracts exactly
CONFIG_SYS_NONCACHED_MEMORY, whereas the equivalent calculation in
cache.c:noncached_init() rounds the noncached size up to section
alignment before subtracting it. The two calculations differ if the
noncached region size is not a multiple of the MMU section size.
In practice, one/both of those issues causes a practical problem on
Jetson TX1; U-Boot triggers a synchronous abort during initialization,
likely due to overlapping use of some memory region.
This change fixes both these issues by duplicating the exact calculations
from noncached_init() into reserve_noncached().
However, this fix assumes that gd->start_addr_sp on entry to
reserve_noncached() exactly matches mem_malloc_start on entry to
noncached_init(). I haven't traced the code to see whether it absolutely
guarantees this in all (or indeed any!) cases. Consequently, I added some
comments in the hope that this condition will continue to be true.
Fixes: 5f7adb5b1c02 ("board_f: reserve noncached space below malloc area")
Cc: Vikas Manocha <vikas.manocha@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-rockchip')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions