| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
On the Raspberry Pi 4, after a PCI reset, VL805's (a xHCI chip) firmware
may either be loaded directly from an EEPROM or, if not present, by the
SoC's VideCore (the SoC's co-processor). Introduce the function that
informs VideCore that VL805 may need its firmware loaded.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
|
|
We move the per SOC define BCM283x_BASE to a global variable.
This is a first step to provide a single binary for several bcm283x
SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
|
|
This clock has a different mbox ID so have this included in the relevant
header file.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan <andrei@balena.io>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
|
|
Devices of bcm283x have different base address, depending if they are on
bcm2835 or bcm2836/7. Use BCM283x_BASE depending on the SoC you want to
build and only add the offset in the header files.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan <andrei@balena.io>
|
|
Before we can send a message to the mailbox we have to check that there
is space to do so. Therefore we poll the status register. But up to now
the wrong status register, the one of mailbox 0, was checked. Fix this
by polling the status regiser of mailbox 1.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Vogt <fvogt@suse.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
[mb: rename registers and update commit message]
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
|
|
The MBOX_TAG_TEST_PIXEL_ORDER define is incorrect. According to official
documentation it has a slightly different numbering.
Correct mailbox constants are defined in e.g.
linux raspberry-firmware https://code.woboq.org/linux/linux/include/soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h.html#RPI_FIRMWARE_FRAMEBUFFER_TEST_PIXEL_ORDER
These are obtained from the bcm2835 documentation
e.g. https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/wiki/Mailbox-property-interface#test-pixel-order
Fix the define to get us back in sync with the spec.
Signed-off-by: Berkus Decker <berkus+github@metta.systems>
[agraf: clarify subject, extend commit message]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@csgraf.de>
[mb: updating email of agraf]
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
|
|
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Currently, CONFIG_BCM2835 is defined for all BCM283x builds and _BCM2836
is defined when building for that SoC. That means there isn't a single
define that means "exactly BCM2835". This will complicate future patches
where BCM2835-vs-anything-else needs to be determined simply.
Modify the code to define one or the other of CONFIG_BCM2835/BCM2836 so
future patches are simpler.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
Gets propagated into the device tree and then into /proc/cpuinfo where
users often expect it.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
|
|
There are two numbering schemes for the RPi revision values; old and new
scheme. The values within each scheme overlap. Hence, it doesn't make
sense to have absolute/global names for the revision IDs. Get rid of the
names and just use the raw revision/type values to set up the array of
per-revision data.
This change makes most sense when coupled with the next change. However,
it's split out so that the mechanical cut/paste is separate from the
logic changes for easier review and problem bisection.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
|
|
Seen this one in the wild. Is labelled "Raspberry Pi Model A+ V1.1,
(C) Raspberry Pi 2014". A standard A+ board, much like the one with
version 0x12, didn't notice any differencies.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
|
|
When using dcache the setup data for the mailbox must be actually written
into memory before calling into firmware. Thus flush and invalidate the
memory.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
|
|
According to Gordon Henderson's WiringPi library, there are some more
Pi revision IDs out there. Add support for them.
http://git.drogon.net/?p=wiringPi;a=blob_plain;f=wiringPi/wiringPi.c;hb=5edd177112c99416f68ba3e8c6c4db6ed942e796
At least ID 0x13 is out in the wild:
Reported-by: Chee-Yang Chau <cychau@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
|
|
Move arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm283x/*
-> arch/arm/mach-bcm283x/include/mach/*
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
|
