summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board186.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-06-05ARM: tegra: Unify Tegra186 buildsThierry Reding
Tegra186 build are currently dealt with in very special ways, which is because Tegra186 is fundamentally different in many respects. It is no longer necessary to do many of the low-level programming because early boot firmware will already have taken care of it. Unfortunately, separating Tegra186 builds from the rest in this way makes it difficult to share code with prior generations of Tegra. With all of the low-level programming code behind Kconfig guards, the build for Tegra186 can again be unified. As a side-effect, and partial reason for this change, other Tegra SoC generations can now make use of the code that deals with taking over a boot from earlier bootloaders. This used to be nvtboot, but has been replaced by cboot nowadays. Rename the files and functions related to this to avoid confusion. The implemented protocols are unchanged. Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
2018-05-07SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel styleTom Rini
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line) and with slightly different comment styles than us. In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style. This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag and have introduced one. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2018-04-27Remove unnecessary instances of DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTRTom Rini
We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added that line "just in case" during development and never dropped it. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2016-11-07ARM: tegra: add SoC-level hook for board_late_init()Stephen Warren
Extend the Tegra186 implementation of board_late_init() to call a per-SoC "hook" function. This will allow SoC-specific (rather than Tegra-wide) functionality to be implemented without the core Tegra code needing to be aware of the details. While board186.c is currently only used for Tegra186, it should be applicable to any other future SoC, and perhaps its simple design could be back-ported to older SoCs in the future too. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Acked-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>
2016-09-27mmc: tegra: Add DM_MMC support to Tegra MMC driverTom Warren
Convert the Tegra MMC driver to DM_MMC. Support for non-DM is removed to avoid ifdefs in the code. DM_MMC is now enabled for all Tegra builds. Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com> (swarren, fixed some NULL pointer dereferences, removed extraneous changes, rebased on various other changes, removed non-DM support etc.) Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
2016-09-27mmc: tegra: move pad_init_mmc() into MMC driverStephen Warren
pad_init_mmc() is performing an SoC-specific operation, using registers within the MMC controller. There's no reason to implement this code outside the MMC driver, so move it inside the driver. Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
2016-08-15ARM: tegra: move ft_system_setup()Stephen Warren
Currently, ft_system_setup() is implemented by board*.c, which are a bit of a dumping ground for a bunch of unrelated functionality, and separate versions exist for pre-Tegra186 and Tegra186. Move the implementation into a separate file to separate functionality, and allow sharing. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
2016-08-04ARM: tegra: call tegra_board_init on Tegra186Stephen Warren
Introduce tegra_board_init() and call it from board_init(). Tegra wil use tegra_board_init() for board-specific initialization, and board_init() for SoC-specific initialization. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
2016-07-21ARM: tegra: pick up actual memory sizeStephen Warren
On Tegra186, U-Boot is booted by the binary firmware as if it were a Linux kernel. Consequently, a DTB is passed to U-Boot. Cache the address of that DTB, and parse the /memory/reg property to determine the actual RAM regions that U-Boot and subsequent EL2/EL1 SW may actually use. Given the binary FW passes a DTB to U-Boot, I anticipate the suggestion that U-Boot use that DTB as its control DTB. I don't believe that would work well, so I do not plan to put any effort into this. By default the FW-supplied DTB is the L4T kernel's DTB, which uses non-upstreamed DT bindings. U-Boot aims to use only upstreamed DT bindings, or as close as it can get. Replacing this DTB with a DTB using upstream bindings is physically quite easy; simply replace the content of one of the GPT partitions on the eMMC. However, the binary FW at least partially relies on the existence/content of some nodes in the DTB, and that requires the DTB to be written according to downstream bindings. Equally, if U-Boot continues to use appended DTBs built from its own source tree, as it does for all other Tegra platforms, development and deployment is much easier. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
2016-05-31ARM: tegra: add core Tegra186 supportStephen Warren
This adds the bare minimum code to support Tegra186, with UART and eMMC working. The empty gpio.h is required because <asm/gpio.h> includes it. A future cleanup round may be able to solve this for all Tegra generations at once. mach-tegra/Makefile is adjusted not to compile anything for Tegra186, but instead to defer everything to mach-tegra/tegra186/Makefile. This allows the SoC code to pick-and-choose which of the C files in the "common" mach-tegra/ directory to compile in based on the SoC's needs. Most of the code is not valid for Tegra186, and this approach removes the need for mach-tegra/Makefile to contain many SoC-specific ifdefs. This approach may be applied to all other Tegra SoCs in a future cleanup round. board186.c is introduced to replace board.c and board2.c. These files currently contain a slew of SoC- and board-specific code that is not valid for Tegra186. This approach avoids adding yet more ifdefs to those files. A future cleanup round may refactor most of board*.c into board-/ SoC-specific functions files thus allowing the top-level functions like board_init_early_f to be shared again. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>