| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
[scottwood@freescale.com: use chip instead of redundant priv_nand]
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
Add a flag to nand_read_skip_bad() such that if true, any trailing
pages in an eraseblock whose contents are entirely 0xff will be
dropped.
The implementation is via a new drop_ffs() function which is
based on the function of the same name from the ubiformat
utility by Artem Bityutskiy.
This is as-per the reccomendations of the UBI FAQ [1]
[1] http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubi.html#L_flasher_algo
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
CC: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
CC: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
When specified in the flags argument of nand_write, WITH_YAFFS_OOB causes an
operation which is mutually exclusive with the 'usual' way of writing.
Add a check that client code does not specify WITH_YAFFS_OOB along with any
other flags and add a comment indicating that the WITH_YAFFS_OOB flag should
not be mixed with other flags.
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
CC: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
In a future commit the behaviour of nand_write_skip_bad()
will be further extended.
Convert the only flag currently passed to the nand_write_
skip_bad() function to a bitfield of only one allocated
member. This should avoid an explosion of int's at the
end of the parameter list or the ambiguous calls like
nand_write_skip_bad(info, offset, len, buf, 0, 1, 1);
nand_write_skip_bad(info, offset, len, buf, 0, 1, 0);
Instead there will be:
nand_write_skip_bad(info, offset, len, buf, WITH_YAFFS_OOB |
WITH_OTHER);
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Acked-by: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
Poke the watchdog in a variety of looping constructs, which could take
a long time to complete.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
This patch add addition suffix to nand write to give the uboot
the power to directly burn the yaffs image to nand.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen <leiwen@marvell.com>
|
|
Get rid of the several "#if 0" sections that were keeping around Linux
code that isn't relevant to U-Boot. Besides cluttering the code, these
sections make tracking upstream changes harder, rather than easier.
It's easy to discard obviously irrelevant diff hunks that patch rejects,
but it's not as easy to notice hunks that apply cleanly to the #if 0
section, but *are* relevant to U-Boot and require modification elsewhere.
Also remove suspend/resume, as this is not applicable to U-Boot. Removal
saves 232 bytes on powerpc.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
|
|
A while back, in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054428.html,
Michele De Candia posted a patch to not count bad blocks toward the
requested size to be erased. This is desireable when you're passing in
something like $filesize, but not when you're trying to erase a partition.
Thus, a .spread subcommand (named for consistency with
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/075163.html) is introduced
to make explicit the user's desire to erase for a given amount of data,
rather than to erase a specific region of the chip.
While passing $filesize to "nand erase" is useful, accidentally passing
something like $fliesize currently produces quite unpleasant results, as the
variable evaluates to nothing and U-Boot assumes that you want to erase
the entire rest of the chip/partition. To improve the safety of the
erase command, require the user to make explicit their intentions by
using a .part or .chip subcommand. This is an incompatible user interface
change, but keeping compatibility would eliminate the safety gain, and IMHO
it's worth it.
While touching nand_erase_opts(), make it accept 64-bit offsets and sizes,
fix the percentage display when erase length is rounded up, eliminate
an inconsistent warning about rounding up the erase length which only
happened when the length was less than one block (rounding up for $filesize
is normal operation), and add a diagnostic if there's an attempt to erase
beginning at a non-block boundary.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
|
|
The underlying code in nand_base.c already supports non-page-aligned reads
and writes, but the block-skipping wrapper code did not.
With block skipping, an unaligned start address is not useful since you
really want to be starting at the beginning of a partition -- or at least
that's where you want to start checking for blocks to skip, but we don't
(yet) support that. So we still require the start address to be aligned.
An unaligned length, though, is useful for passing $filesize to the
read/write command, and handling it does not complicate block skipping.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
|
|
|
|
Currently, the last block of NAND devices can't be accessed. This patch
fixes this issue by correcting the boundary checking (off-by-one error).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
|
There is more and more usage of printing 64bit values,
so enable this feature generally, and delete the
CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF and CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_STRTOUL
defines.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
|
|
Depending on offset, flash size and the number of bad blocks,
get_len_incl_bad may return a too small value which may lead to:
1) If there are no bad blocks, nand_{read,write}_skip_bad chooses the
bad block aware read/write code. This may hurt performance, but does
not have any adverse effects.
2) If there are bad blocks, the nand_{read,write}_skip_bad may choose
the bad block unaware read/write code (if len_incl_bad == *length)
which leads to corrupted data.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hobi <daniel.hobi@schmid-telecom.ch>
|
|
Signed-off-by: giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com
Acked-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Glushkov <gvv@lstec.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulraj, Sandeep <s-paulraj@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
nand_util currently uses size_t which is arch dependent and not always a
unsigned long. Now use loff_t, as does the linux mtd layer.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
This patch brings the U-Boot MTD infrastructure in sync with the current
Linux MTD version (2.6.30-rc3). Biggest change is the 64bit device size
support and a resync of the mtdpart.c file which has seen multiple fixes
meanwhile.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
Enable nand lock, unlock and status of lock feature.
Not every device and platform requires this, hence,
it is under define for CONFIG_CMD_NAND_LOCK_UNLOCK
Nand unlock and status operate on block boundary instead
of page boundary. Details in:
http://www.micron.com/products/partdetail?part=MT29C2G24MAKLAJG-6%20IT
Intial solution provided by Vikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@ti.com>
Includes preliminary suggestions from Scott Wood
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
This caused the operation to be needlessly repeated if there were
no bad blocks and no errors.
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Glushkov <gvv@lstec.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
As reported by Ilko Iliev <iliev@ronetix.at>, the "nand erase clean"
command is currently broken, and among other things causes all blocks
to be marked bad.
This implements it properly using MTD_OOB_AUTO, along with some
indentation fixes.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
|
|
rename CFG_NAND_LEGACY to CONFIG_NAND_LEGACY
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
|
Implement block-skipping read/write, based on a patch from
Morten Ebbell Hestens <morten.hestnes@tandberg.com>.
Signed-off-by: Morten Ebbell Hestnes <morten.hestnes@tandberg.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: William Juul <william.juul@tandberg.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
A lot changed in the Linux MTD code, since it was last ported from
Linux to U-Boot. This patch takes U-Boot NAND support to the level
of Linux 2.6.22.1 and will enable support for very large NAND devices
(4KB pages) and ease the compatibility between U-Boot and Linux
filesystems.
This patch is tested on two custom boards with PPC and ARM
processors running YAFFS in U-Boot and Linux using gcc-4.1.2
cross compilers.
MAKEALL ppc/arm has some issues:
* DOC/OneNand/nand_spl is not building (I have not tried porting
these parts, and since I do not have any HW and I am not familiar
with this code/HW I think its best left to someone else.)
Except for the issues mentioned above, I have ported all drivers
necessary to run MAKEALL ppc/arm without errors and warnings. Many
drivers were trivial to port, but some were not so trivial. The
following drivers must be examined carefully and maybe rewritten to
some degree:
cpu/ppc4xx/ndfc.c
cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/nand.c
board/delta/nand.c
board/zylonite/nand.c
Signed-off-by: William Juul <william.juul@tandberg.com>
Signed-off-by: Stig Olsen <stig.olsen@tandberg.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
|
|
This patch fixes NAND related printf format warning. Those warnings are
now visible since patch dc4b0b38d4aadf08826f6c31270f1eecd27964fd
[Fix printf errors.] by Andrew Klossner has been applied. Thanks, this is
really helpful.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
|
|
For NAND erase sizes smaller than one NAND erase block, erase
percentage output becomes grater than 100% e.g.
-- cut --
> nand info
Device 0: NAND 64MiB 1,8V 8-bit, sector size 16 KiB
> nand erase 0x100000 0x2000
NAND erase: device 0 offset 0x100000, size 0x2000
Erasing at 0x100000 -- 200% complete.
OK
>
-- cut --
Correct this and give user a warning that more is erased than specified:
-- cut --
> nand erase 0x100000 0x2000
NAND erase: device 0 offset 0x100000, size 0x2000
Warning: Erase size 0x00002000 smaller than one erase block 0x00004000
Erasing 0x00004000 instead
Erasing at 0x100000 -- 100% complete.
OK
>
-- cut --
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@ziswiler.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
|
